Three prevalent themes in the discussion
| Theme | Supporting quotations |
|---|---|
| 1. Ambiguity over the exact word‑count rule | - kmoser: > Does it have to be 1,000 words? - bjourne: "Does it have to be 1,000 words?" Yes. That’s what a picture is worth, after all. Your entry must be exactly 1,000 words, not including the title (if you choose to write one). - chrisweekly: My personal instinct is to interpret it as a minimum of 1,000 words -- but it remains ambiguous. |
| 2. Perceived triviality / skill debate | - danlitt: I don't understand this comment at all... how on earth is that the only skill involved? - sheept: It's relatively easy to write many words, but it takes more skill to express the same message with fewer words, like how video compression needs more time for fewer bytes and same quality. - grimgrin: this entire thread exists because of the ignored [2] in the link. |
| 3. Application bait and unclear instructions | - tom1337890: Looking forward to some writing assignments. Like in school. Sometimes I miss that in my day to day job. - Gualdrapo: Took the bait and sent them my email to apply because, in the page linked, they would "send you the instructions" ... |
The discussion centers on confusion about the “exactly 1,000 words” requirement, debate over whether such a constraint is a meaningful skill test, and reactions to what many see as a gimmicky email‑bait application process.