1. Outdated Hardware and Affordable Upgrades
Users criticize the 12-year-old server as inadequate for modern Android builds and propose cheap alternatives like Ryzen systems. "You can buy a second hand system with tons of ram and a 16-core Ryzen for like $400" (IshKebab). "Building a budget AM4 system for roughly $500 would be within the realm of reason" (neogodless). Defenses note RAM shortages and ECC needs.
2. Concerns Over Non-Professional Hosting Location
Heavy skepticism about the server hosted by a "long time contributor" rather than a data center, fearing basement setups and risks like tampering or outages. "Instead it's in some guy's bedroom. Not reassuring" (IshKebab). "It makes it sound like a very amateurish operation... janky setup in some random guy's closet" (skiing_crawling). Counterarguments highlight trust in contributors and replicable builds.
3. Volunteer Constraints vs. Professional Standards
Debate on whether F-Droid's setup suits a donation-funded volunteer project ($400k grant noted) or demands colo/cloud redundancy. "It's an open-source project. It should be... open. Not mysterious" (wtallis). "The internet is run on binaries compiled in servers in random basements" (lrvick). Critics urge colo ("$50/month... excellent quality" - Aurornis); defenders say it's sustainable and non-critical.