1. Tokenizer shift raisestoken count and cost
"I wanted to better understand the potential impact for the tokenizer change from 4.6 and 4.7." — pawelduda 2. Higher token usage translates into steeper pricing concerns
"45% is brutal if you're building on top of these models as a bootstrapped founder." — shailendra_s
3. Adaptive/extended thinking introduces inefficiency and quality trade‑offs
"adaptive thinking ... eats 5‑10% of my Max 5x usage and churns for ten minutes, only to come back with totally untrustworthy results." — sutterd
4. Opus 4.6/4.7 are viewed as regressions for fine‑grained prompting > "Opus 4.5 is basically ideal. Opus 4.6 and 4.7 seem optimized for longer tasks… Opus 4.6 was a regression." — rectang
5. Growing push toward open‑source/local models to avoid lock‑in
"I don't want a hard dependency on another multi‑billion dollar company." — zozbot234
6. Skepticism about productivity hype; marginal gains don’t justify rising costs
"Never attribute to incompetence what is sufficiently explained by greed." — willis936