1. OpenCode's Superior Engineering to Claude Code
Users repeatedly highlight OpenCode's advanced TUI, multi-provider support, lack of flickering, and features like web resumption, calling Claude Code buggy and inferior.
"dboon: The unfortunate truth is that the engineering in opencode is so far ahead of Claude Code... it doesn't flicker at 30 FPS whenever it spawns a subagent."
"azuanrb: Opencode has a web UI, so I can open it on my laptop and then resume the same session on the web from my phone."
2. Anthropic's Financial Motivations and Subsidized Pricing
Subscriptions ($200/mo Max Plan) are far cheaper than API for heavy use ($1k+/mo), seen as loss-leaders for lock-in, telemetry, and data collection; blocking prevents abuse.
"dfabulich: Anthropic's $200/month subscription for Claude Code is much cheaper than Anthropic's pay-as-you-go API... easy to use so many LLM tokens that it would have cost you more than $1,000."
"weird-eye-issue: This could be so easily abused by companies who spend thousands of dollars per month for API costs you could just reverse engineer it and use the subscription tokens."
3. Embarrassment and Poor Product Quality for Anthropic
Claude Code's bugs (flickering, scrolling, key handling) and failure to leverage their own LLMs undermine their AI leadership claims.
"dboon: Anyway, this is embarrassing for Anthropic... a mid-tier systems programmer isn't making these mistakes."
"alexiez: If only Claude Code developers had access to a powerful LLM that would allow them to close the engineering gap. Oh, wait..."
4. User Backlash, Cancellations, and Workarounds
Many cancel subscriptions, switch to OpenAI/GLM, or use fixes; seen as shortsighted amid open-source alternatives.
"planet_1649c: Cancelled my claude subscription over it. Opencode is miles ahead."
"lemming: All they've achieved here is that I am no longer giving them money... my money is going to OpenAI instead."