Three prevalent themes in the discussion
- Critique of the redevelopment as soulless, luxury‑driven gentrification serving foreign wealth
- “The redeveloped Battersea Power Station is one of the most soulless, dead-eyed, wealth‑obsessed places in all of London. This is a terrible place to put something like a music venue… making a music venue for the foreign money laundromat.” – dofm
-
“It’s a dreadful, dreadful project… It is absolutely still gentrification if you take one of the few places in London where people who work in lower‑income jobs used to be able to afford to live and make it a luxury zone for unexplained wealth.” – dofm
-
Positive view of the area as welcoming, safe, and a good fit for Apple’s brand experience
- “I stayed in Battersea for a week while exploring London. I found the place very welcoming, safe and inspiring. It’s convenient to get to and from with its dedicated underground line… I can see how it fits the Apple brand experience very well.” – flyinglizard
-
“It’s a combination of a park, a residential neighborhood and a shopping center… The residential buildings themselves are also special, with some designed by Frank Gehry… We stayed in an apartment overlooking the station front and it was a lovely sight.” – flyinglizard
-
Debate over the venue’s true purpose – Apple’s spatial‑audio showcase and content creation versus supporting the broader live‑music scene
- “the purpose of the 600 seats is to give musicians optimal conditions for the creation of music (to be recorded or streamed live) and to showcase to selected audiences Apple's audio technologies.” – hollerith
- “I think their target audience are Apple Music subscribers who are going to watch the recordings of the live videos; they could probably care less who attend's their concerts.” – wyre
- “Apple just invented concerts, what will they think of next…” – leptons (reflecting skepticism about Apple’s vertical integration).