1. Debate on Licensing and "Open Source" Status
Dominant discussion questions if the "research purposes only" model license qualifies as open source, favoring "source-available" terminology.
"Exclusively for research purposes" so not actually open source. -RobotToaster
The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. -tremon (quoting OSI)
This is source-available: you get to see the code and learn from it, but if you're not allowed to use it however you want... then it's not the traditional definition of open source. -Aachen
2. Ties to Apple Spatial Features
Many link it to iOS 26/visionOS "Spatial Scenes" for immersive photo viewing.
Is this the same model as the โSpatial Scenesโ feature in iOS 26? If so, itโs been wildly impressive. -gjsman-1000
In my experience that was really incredible. You could take a standard 2D photo of someone and suddenly you were back in the room with them. -basisword
Itโs included in the ios photo gallery... create seemingly 3d scenes from 2d images, in the iOS photos app. -consonaut, givinguflac
3. Excitement for 3D/VR Applications
Praise for fast inference and potential in spatial content, VR, film despite limitations.
3D splats are going to be incredibly useful for film and graphics design. You can rotate the camera around and get predictable, consistent details. -echelon
Itโll be great taking old photos... and experiencing them in VR. -basisword
Making 3D worlds like that is impressive... content generation is a huge time sink. -wkat4242