Theme 1 – Apple’s silicon is macOS‑centric and lacks open documentation
- “Their Silicon was written to be OS agnostic, Apple’s was not.” – BloodyIron
- “Apple silicon has features specifically designed for macOS or software running on macOS. e.g.: Rosetta 2.” – bayindirh
- “Apple doesn’t … post documents to explain how to use their hardware. … Apple consumes it, so Apple always has a customer.” – MBCook
Theme 2 – Reverse‑engineering Apple’s custom chips is a massive, impressive undertaking
- “Reverse-engineering Apple's custom silicon is basically the modern equivalent of repairing a spaceship while it's actively launching. Incredible work by the Asahi team!” – Krish1577
- “The market for people who want to install Linux on a Mac laptop is very tiny… not worth the huge effort investment needed to document an entire platform for public consumption.” – Aurornis
- “Intel and AMD post documents… Apple doesn’t. So it’s not an equivalent effort by any stretch.” – MBCook
Theme 3 – Apple’s business incentives discourage official Linux support (walled‑garden lock‑in)
- “They want control on the walled garden… If they gave you a way to install linux easily then you could use it far past their intended lifespan and wouldnt keep you locked into the apple ecosystem.” – alt227
- “Because then they'll have to compete with Linux, which opens them up to someone else making a cheaper computer that does the same stuff.” – ajross
- “Apple could contribute as well… Why are you demanding a user does that for free instead of the big corp that made the platform?” – izacus