The Hacker News discussion reveals three highly prevalent themes regarding consumer electronics, particularly Apple AirPods, as substitutes or complements to traditional hearing aids (HAs):
1. Consumer Audio Devices (like AirPods) are a Viable, Low-Stakes Entry Point for Hearing Assistance
Many users reported successfully using AirPods Pro (often second generation) to significantly improve hearing for themselves or relatives with mild to moderate loss, often overcoming vanity or reluctance associated with traditional HAs. The accessibility and familiar form factor make them easy to adopt.
- Supporting Quotation: One user convinced their father-in-law to wear AirPods Pro 2 after a decade of resistance: "From the other side, itβs night and day. We can have conversations. He can hear my kids. The TV volume is set to reasonable levels." ("yojo")
- Supporting Quotation: Another user noted the low barrier to entry: "Itβs a pretty low price of entry for something that could literally be life changing." ("yojo")
2. Traditional Hearing Aids Offer Superior, Purpose-Built Performance (Especially Battery Life and Complex Noise Filtering)
While AirPods are praised as a great entry point, participants with more severe or long-term loss emphasized that dedicated HAs, particularly newer AI-driven models, offer crucial advantages that consumer devices lack, such as longer battery life and advanced, context-aware noise cancellation capabilities.
- Supporting Quotation: Regarding battery life for full-time use: "My understanding is they are pretty good hearing aids, but they don't have the battery life that purpose-built aids do (4-5 hours vs 18-24) so they're not optimal for full-time use." ("CommieBobDole")
- Supporting Quotation: A user comparing high-end HAs to AirPods noted the professional capability: "HAs are better, especially the new ones with AI built in... The newest HAs have AI that helps in noisy environments... It is truly unbelievable in noisy environments." ("dts-five")
3. Bluetooth Connectivity and Microphone Routing Create Significant User Experience Friction
A recurring point of frustration centered on how devices handle microphones during phone calls and routing audio between earbuds/HAs and smartphones, particularly when integrating with the Apple ecosystem. Users expect AirPods-like seamlessness but find dedicated HAs sometimes adopt "crappy AirPods behavior" (using the HA mic instead of the superior phone mic) or suffer from unreliable switching.
- Supporting Quotation: A user described issues with a specific model mimicking AirPods behavior: "With the newer Phonaks, I was very disappointed to find that the new hearing aids would only use the microphone input that is built into the hearing aids themselves... Because my hearing aids are Behind The Ear (BTE) and thus the mic input on the hearing aid is a good 4 inches away from my face and thus my voice cannot possibly sound as clear as when I could speak directly into an iPhone mic." ("mustntmumble")
- Supporting Quotation: Another commented on the general lack of control: "It's because Apple refuses to give us fine-grained controls on our Bluetooth devices" when discussing the difficulty of switching microphones during calls. ("ezfe")