1. Contactless payments reduce friction and are gaining merchant acceptance
Users note that even reluctant merchants (e.g., Walmart, Kroger, Home Depot) now support Apple Pay/tap‑to‑pay, and that the speed gain outweighs the fees banks charge.
“I get why the banks are not happy, but I can tell them that I am not going to use Chase Wallet… just pay the fee and be thankful for the reduced payment friction, which they invariably make money from.” – havaloc
“Every big merchant has now relented (Kroger, Home Depot, Walmart).” – havaloc
2. Privacy and data‑collection concerns around tech‑giant wallets
Commenters debate whether Apple Pay shields transaction data from Apple and merchants, contrasting it with the extensive tracking that occurs when users share phone numbers or use proprietary wallets.
“Apple doesn't see individual transactions when Apple Pay is used… the secret card payment token is sent from the phone to the credit‑card's issuing bank and bypasses Apple servers.” – jasode
“Another alternative… is tapping a piece of plastic instead of your phone and not inviting any of the tech giants into your transactions at all.” – add‑sub‑mul‑div
3. Desire for low‑cost, non‑proprietary payment infrastructure (e.g., Brazil’s Pix or a government‑run system)
Several participants advocate for payment networks that avoid private‑sector rent‑seeking, citing Pix as a successful state‑driven model and arguing that payment facilitation should be a public utility.
“create a payment network that don't rely on private institutions rent seeking behavior, like Pix in Brazil.” – braiamp
“The government's problem… payment facilitation should be a service provided by the government.” – radialstub
“Pix is doing exactly the right thing… ECB/SEPA is as well.” – KellyCriterion