1. 2.4GHz propagation limits
The consensus is that 2.4 GHz suffers far higher path loss than sub‑GHz bands, making long‑range links much harder.
"Propagation (FSPL) is a lot better at 868/915 Mhz than 2.4Ghz." — lormayna
2. Practical use‑case motivations Many participants see mesh radio as a low‑cost way to enable remote sensor or mountaineering links where cellular or satellite is unaffordable.
"I really want to solution for remote mountaineering communication that’s not just GMRS... Meshtastic should be the obvious answer." — KingMachiavelli
3. Community skepticism & implementation realities
The thread repeatedly flags technical debt, regulatory friction, and immature tooling as reasons why most projects remain “toys.”
"It doesn't surprise me. This is a deep networking problem and very few CS people know anything about networking or how to design clean, fast, low‑overhead network protocols and systems." — syntaxing