The three most prevalent themes in the Hacker News discussion about Calvin and Hobbes are:
1. Watterson's Integrity and Refusal to Commercialize
Users highly value Bill Watterson's decision to maintain artistic control, culminating in his early retirement from the strip, which is seen as preserving the legacy and integrity of the work. This contrasts sharply with many other long-running comics.
"Watterson, famously, never sold out. He is sort of an idealized, godlike figure, to many cartoonists." - "ChrisMarshallNY" "Bill Waterson had the integrity not to license his work, preferring that the reader not have the characters spoiled. He opted not to make boatloads of money in making this decision (cough, garfield, snoopy)." - "alsetmusic"
2. Dual Appeal and Ageless Quality
Many posters note that Calvin and Hobbes successfully resonates with both children and adults, with the humor and subtext revealing deeper meanings upon re-reading as one ages.
"It still holds up for kids of today. My son is a second gen Calvin and Hobbes kid." - "adolph" "The humor lands when youโre a kid, but the subtext only becomes clear as an adult." - "danishSuri1994"
3. Conflict Between Childhood Idealism and Adult Cynicism/Pragmatism
There is significant discussion comparing Calvin's anti-establishment, imaginative worldview with the jaded perspectives sometimes adopted by adults, including Calvin's father or Watterson himself in later strips. Some users express a shift in identification from Calvin to the father figure over time.
"I think the cartoonist was naturally growing older and more disillusioned, and his strip faintly started to sound like Calvinโs dad instead of Calvin." - "HeinzStuckeIt" "As a child I identified with Calvin. Now as a 50+ year old I find I identify much more with the dad." - "irrational"