Based on the Hacker News discussion, here are the 4 most prevalent themes of opinion:
1. macOS Offers Hardware and Software Integration That Linux Lacks
Many users choose macOS primarily for the seamless integration between the operating system and high-quality hardware, such as excellent battery life, trackpads, and displays. This is particularly crucial for users reliant on commercial creative software or specific professional workflows not available on Linux.
"I've never personally understood the point of macOS for power users... what does macOS offer a power user that Linux doesn't, and which makes it worth sacrificing the ability to run your machine the way you want?" โ jbstack
"Better integration with hardware (and good hardware), energy efficiency, power management... Support from commercial software vendors." โ JodieBenitez
"There are power users who like to tinker. And there are people who do a bit of both... For me, battery life and power management โ even with the number of services that macOS runs." โ nxobject
2. "Just Works" vs. "Tinkering" Defines the User Experience
A core debate centers on the definition of a "power user." Many argue that macOS provides a reliable, out-of-the-box experience that frees up time for actual work, contrasting it with the time-consuming configuration and maintenance often associated with Linux.
"I consider myself a power user. What I don't consider myself is a 'configuration hobbyist'... I used Linux for 10 years and I got tired of updates breaking things and having to edit configuration files just to get the system back to 'normal.'" โ chongli
"I've never personally understood the point of macOS for power users... The question pretends that there is a whole group of 'power users' who all do the same thing, but that couldn't be further from the truth." โ oneeyedpigeon
"At some age you realize that tinkering with your OS is a giant waste of time. I just want a reliable thing that gets me A to B... Sometimes having less choice is freeing." โ turtlebits
3. macOS Has Degraded as a User-Controllable, Open System
A significant portion of the discussion agrees with the original article's premise that modern macOS, with its Signed System Volume (SSV) and System Integrity Protection (SIP), has moved away from the Unix philosophy of user control and customization, making it feel more like a "locked-down" or "bloated" system.
"Instead of forcing iOS onto laptops, they locked down MacOS." โ latchkey
"Apple does not allow people using MacOS to modify it... macOS cannot easily be used on a variety of hardware, only on Apple's proprietary hardware." โ 1vuio0pswjnm7
"SSV can be disabled. It would be ill-advised to do so, but Apple intentionally allows you to do that... The article is a bit outdated, but it should still be possible to do all of that." โ sgjohnson (noting it is possible but comes with significant trade-offs)
4. The "Unix" Label on macOS is a Point of Contention
The technical and philosophical classification of macOS as a "Unix" system sparked a heated debate. While macOS is officially UNIX-certified, many argue that its design philosophy, proprietary nature, and security restrictions diverge significantly from the open and customizable ideals of traditional Unix systems.
"To the Unix purist, this might appear wasteful and unnecessary, but macOS isnโt, and never has been, Unix. Itโs a closed-source proprietary operating system..." โ tux3 (from the article)
"MacOS is the most UNIXy of the UNIXes... 1. Comparatively heavyweight 2. Proprietary 3. UNIX APIs." โ paulddraper
"The point the author is clearly attempting to make is that the idea and system of macOS is not Unix. Even if macOS is, legally speaking, 'UNIXยฎ', it was not made to be UNIXยฎ." โ spijdar