1. “Vibe‑coding” vs. real engineering
Many users feel Anthropic’s marketing pushes a “just ask the AI” mentality that alienates seasoned developers.
“Another case of devs are out of touch with users basics needs…” – htx80nerd
“Vibe‑coders griping about Claude’s vibe‑coded CLI hits all the right vibes.” – artisin
“The hype about vibe coding lets everyone think they can now be an engineer.” – jascha_eng
2. Loss of transparency and verbose output
The recent CLI change that hides file‑read details has sparked backlash from users who need that visibility to debug and control the agent.
“They removed, without any need, info and hid it in a wall of text.” – thunfischtoast
“I want to see the level of detail that the author wants and others for whom it's not useful.” – idopmstuff
“The other thing is that it’s a feature that people want to see the file paths and search patterns inline.” – arjie
3. Pricing, subscription vs. API, and perceived value
Debate over whether the subscription model is worth the cost, especially when the same models can be accessed via API or other tools.
“Claude Code allows you to use the Anthropic monthly subscription instead of API tokens, which for power users is massively less expensive.” – nicetryguy
“If you’re paying $200/month, you’re basically paying an engineer’s salary.” – co_king_3
“OpenCode works with Claude Code Max, and the TUI is 100x better.” – resiros
4. UX / CLI performance and configurability
Users complain about lag, lack of real‑time feedback, and the difficulty of customizing the interface.
“It’s pretty easy to run in a stronger sandbox too.” – lukev
“The CLI is not open source, so we can’t go in and change it ourselves.” – iamleppert
“The CLI is laggy and takes multiple seconds to start.” – koakuma-chan
These four themes capture the core concerns—developer mindset, transparency, cost, and user experience—that dominate the discussion.