Here is a summary of the 4 most prevalent themes from the discussion:
1. Nostalgia and a Market for Physical Keyboards
Many users express a strong desire for the tactile feedback and efficiency of physical keyboards (PKB), citing nostalgia for devices like the BlackBerry and Palm Treo. There is a consensus that modern touchscreens are inferior for extended typing, especially for power users or those typing in multiple languages.
- SunshineTheCat: "I actually use to have a Palm Treo and I feel like I stopped being able to text even remotely efficiently ever since I switched from that to my first iPhone."
- wowczarek: "Well, seems to have all the right ingredients: - PKB (check) with gestures / navigation (check) - Customisable, colour notification LED (check) - Unified inbox (check)."
- Topfi: "Being able to touch type without looking, even whilst walking around/changing trains has been truly game changing. Writing SOPs, editing spreadsheets, answering long mails, typing without the atrocious autocorrect making it impossible, all that is far better with the Clicks keyboard."
2. OS Freedom and Privacy Concerns
A recurring demand is for the device to run a more open, private, or general-purpose operating system than standard Android. Users frequently mentioned wanting to install Linux, GrapheneOS, or other custom ROMs to avoid Google services and increase privacy and longevity.
- voxleone: "If only form factors like these could run general use/free OS's..."
- drcongo: "One of these running linux would be nice, but definitely not buying one to run Android."
- gumby271: "I wish they'd specify if the bootloader was unlock/relockable. Could have been cool to see GrapheneOS support."
3. Skepticism About Feasibility and Company Reputation
There is significant doubt about the product's viability and the company's ability to deliver. Commenters point to the company's association with F(x)tec (known for delays), the use of a MediaTek SoC (poor Linux support), and the lack of real-world usage videos in marketing materials.
- Elidrake24: "I do worry this is a moonshot that will sink them."
- paxys: "I really do hope they succeed, and will definitely buy one if it turns out to be a viable product, but not before that. I went through the website and all the marketing and watched the launch video to find out how this thing works, but all I see is the same rendered home screen and lots of promises."
- darthbanane: "The leadership behind this project is f(x)tec. While they're not outright scammers they have a TERRIBLE track record in delivering products like this... It's just data points but so far the modus operandi was to take pre-order money and then take years to deliver a bad product with no aftermarket support."
4. Utility of the "Second Device" vs. Daily Driver
Users are divided on the marketing strategy of positioning this as a "second device." Some agree itโs a realistic way to curb distractions, while others (particularly existing Clicks keyboard users) argue it's a confusing message for a device that requires significant practice to master, making it unsuitable for infrequent use.
- LunicLynx: "I think you misunderstood. My point was: This would be a great device if there wasnโt a need for it to support these apps... This would be awesome if it would just be that a โcommunicatorโ meaning a device that allows to communicate."
- memoriuaysj: "people still need their IG and TikTok... you can fight that, and lose (no market) or accept second device status (for werk)"
- Topfi: "I'd argue the two are in fact polar opposites, someone who needs reliable input on the go is likely not the same someone who wants to use their phone less... They have clearly just confused the messaging for the core audience of Clicks... by chasing what I'd argue is a mirage, a customer base that doesn't exist."