1. European clouds are cheap and competitive but still lack the breadth of US hyperscalers
“Hetzner is absolutely 10x more competitive than AWS.” – Imustaskforhelp
“4 TB with 4 TB traffic cost 27 € / month at Hetzner vs 102 € / month on AWS.” – fsflover
2. Data sovereignty is a core driver – the US Cloud Act and potential government interference loom large
“If your data is in the hands of a nation that uses this to block you from your data you should do something about it.” – jgbuddy
“The Cloud Act… means that a US‑based provider can be forced to hand over data.” – BSDobelix
3. Vendor lock‑in and the “one‑cloud” mindset are criticized; multi‑cloud or self‑hosted solutions are preferred
“You can move the simpler solution to bare metal.” – misir
“Multi‑cloud is expensive… you need to learn a whole new set of systems.” – Nextgrid
4. Bureaucracy and regulation are seen as both a barrier and a necessary safeguard
“Europe’s bureaucratization… has increased the last 10 years.” – tirant
“We need to avoid the same kind of over‑regulation that stifles innovation.” – smarx007
5. The EU’s lack of a single, fully‑featured cloud provider is a pain point for startups and enterprises
“There is no European cloud operator able to offer what AWS/GCP/Azure offer.” – armcat
“If you want to use AWS‑style services you have to build them yourself or use a mix of vendors.” – ExoticPearTree
6. EU policy and subsidies are viewed as essential to build a competitive, sovereign cloud ecosystem
“The only way to get serious Euroclouds is some combination of EU intervention and subsidies.” – pyrale
“Mandating EU public administrations to use EU cloud solutions would create a captive market.” – pyrale
These six themes capture the main strands of opinion in the discussion: cost‑competitiveness, sovereignty, lock‑in, regulation, service gaps, and the need for policy‑driven support.