Three prevalent themes in the discussion
1. Language selection / localization rationale
Commenters debated how the site should choose which language to show (IP‑based, Accept-Language, or a fixed set such as the UN official languages) and why bandwidth concerns drive those decisions.
- “What would have been nice is that depending on the visitors IP address’s region, showing a localised message instead of fixed number of languages” — sajithdilshan
- “As it tends to be heavily trafficked, the overall bandwidth is a key consideration” — zahrevsky
- “I believe it's just using the official languages of the UN” — erhuve
2. Use of JavaScript and performance/bandwidth trade‑offs
Many noted the redesign moved content (including the SVG icon) into an external JS file, questioned whether CSS could have sufficed, and highlighted bandwidth savings for non‑JS clients.
- “For some reason the localization still requires javascript… (I'm pretty sure the transition could have been done in just CSS as well)” — p‑t
- “Well, no. The purpose of the redesign is to move as much of the page content as possible into an external javascript file. There's no question of what parts of the page require javascript; the question is what parts of the page can be moved into javascript.” — thaumasiotes
- “Reducing egress bandwidth, if you have automated clients that don't support JS you save precious bytes from being served by not embedding the SVG…” — worg
3. example.com as a de‑facto service for testing/connectivity
Despite IANA’s statement that the domain is “not a service,” many users rely on it to debug captive portals, check basic HTTP connectivity, or as a lightweight “is the internet up?” check.
- “I use it to navigate into captive wifi portals that always seem to be misconfigured.” — chews
- “Same here! Yes, I used it as the well‑known site that supported unencrypted http and no HSTS. Yes, I was one of those guys using the site 'as a service' rather than simply documentation.” — ButlerianJihad
- “Even though IANA says example.com is intended for documentation purposes and not as a service, I feel that it nonetheless serves as a service to the broader internet.” — reincoder