1. Criticism of the vague, uninformative landing page
Many users found the homepage confusing, mistaking it for a game or lacking pricing/docs details.
"Oh I’m going to need more info than this. It’s a service that provides persistent disk and VM’s but doesn’t tell you what those shared resource limits are, what the pricing is..." -reactordev
"That must be worst website ever made. Zero information available on mobile." -sccxy
"The whole UX of this site is garbage and what has fostered so many gripes here." -conductr
2. Enthusiasm for ease of use and quick prototyping
Users praised instant SSH access, persistent disks, sharing, and Shelley AI for rapid development.
"I have played with it and it's so easy get started with that now I want a quick-project idea as an excuse to use it!" -twotwotwo
"I'm not using it yet, but the way that it handles sharing looks incredibly sweet... Just sharing links that people can easily sign into..." -jauntywundrkind
"This is very neat. I will be recommending it to my non-coder friends..." -subdavis
3. Questions on pricing, resources, and VM details
Debate on shared vs. dedicated resources, value vs. VPS, persistence, and tech stack.
"Is this 2 CPUs/8GB RAM per VM (in other words, 50 CPUs/200GB RAM)? If so, this is an unbelievable bargain..." -MontyCarloHall
"The docs remark 'VMs share the resources allocated to the user' so I interpret as resources allocated to your account..." -sickcodebruh
"They are VMs, on a crosvm-derived VMM... Yes, KVM." -crawshaw