1. Skepticism Toward Early-Stage Research and Media Hype
Users widely criticized the article as clickbait with hand-wavy claims, urging caution until more evidence emerges. "It seems to me to all be the handwavy part. I'm happy to wait until the research is considerably further advanced, past the clickbait stage." - jibal
"The literature in this area is a mess, has become highly politicized. Iโd give it another 10 or so years before I made any strong statements about these effects in humans." - ch4s3
2. Revival of Lamarckian Ideas via Epigenetics
Debate revived Lamarckism discussions, distinguishing durable epigenetic effects (e.g., stress, diet) from strict Mendelian genetics, with Lysenkoism fears. "Lamarck has entered the chat." - zerofor_conduct
"Is this a revival of Lysenkoism?" - Animats
"Genetics is almost entirely Mendelian, but some of epigenetics is durable and thus Lamarckian." - echelon
3. Limited to Broad Traits, Not Specific Experiences; Offspring Variability
Effects are seen as physiological (e.g., exercise benefits, nicotine tolerance) not specific memories; sibling/twin differences undermine strong inheritance claims. "What can't happen is inter-generational transmission of particular subjective experiences... Only biomolecular-mediated phenotypes... make sense." - harshreality
"My three kids could not be more different and they all have the same mother, grew up in the same house, etc. If 'microRNA' profiles have any influence, I would wager it's very small." - SoftTalker