Theme 1: Request to add a year tag to the post title
"@dang please can we add a [2014] to the title ?" – goldenarm
"Yes please. For a moment I thought Terrence Tao had scooped Anthropic." – thomasahle
Theme 2: Discussion of Terrence Tao’s submission history and reputation
"This is essentially irrelevant to the content of the post, but it's amusing to me that he casually mentions submitting to JAMS as if its acceptance were a mere formality." – tacomonstrous
"With hindsight, some of my past rejections have become amusing… The following year, we managed to finally prove the full conjecture without the epsilon loss… This time, the paper was rejected for only being an epsilon improvement over the previous literature!" – Sharlin
Theme 3: Rumors/speculation about Anthropic solving the Navier‑Stokes Millennium problem and its significance
"This is going around due to rumors and baseless speculation on Twitter … that Anthropic has solved the Millennium problem related to Navier‑Stokes." – v64
"None really. It just says if the NS equations are realistic and can really model real physics or there exist some solutions that make it blow up (infinite energy)." – margorczynski
"For a second I thought they were aiming the scary proof machine at us mortals doing PDE stuff. Fortunately the speculation is just that they happen to be aiming it at a nearby mathematician type problem." – bee_rider