The three most prevalent themes in the discussion are:
-
Concerns over Model Size and Local Usability: Users expressed significant doubt about the feasibility of running the new, large model locally due to massive download sizes and high VRAM requirements, leading to anticipation for smaller, distilled versions.
- "Downloading over 100GB of model weights is a tough sell for the local-only hobbyists." - minimaxir
- "Never mind the download size. Who has the VRAM to run it?" - BadBadJellyBean
-
Comparison and Competitive Positioning Against State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Models: The release is immediately benchmarked against established leaders like Nano Banana Pro, with many users finding Flux.2 to be an iterative improvement at best, often lacking in aesthetic quality compared to competitors.
- "Costwise and generation-speed-wise, Flux 2 Pro is on par with Nano Banana, and adding an image as an input pushes the cost of Flux 2 Pro higher than Nano Banana." - minimaxir
- "The image quality was worse/more obviously AI generated." - minimaxir
-
Ambiguity and Restriction of the "Open Weights" License: There is confusion and frustration regarding the licensing of the open-weights variant, with users pointing out that restrictions effectively mean it is not truly open source, particularly regarding commercial use.
- "So, itβs not open source." - dragonwriter (in response to a user noting the license limits commercial use)
- "Yep, definetly this, They should have creds for open weigths, and bein transparent of it not being open source though." - gunalx