The three most prevalent themes in the Hacker News discussion regarding CachyOS and Framework sponsorship are:
1. CachyOS Performance and Optimization for Gaming
Users are focused on CachyOS's purported speed advantages, particularly related to shader compilation and its overall performance on Framework hardware, often in the context of gaming.
- Supporting Quote: CachyOS user "tristor" documented a minor performance gain: "I migrated from vanilla Arch to CachyOS on my Framework 13 AMD a few months back since I primarily use it for Steam gaming, and it's worked great and netted me around 3fps on average across the games I play."
- Supporting Quote: The reason for the speed boost was attributed to aggressive compilation optimizations: "kachapopopow" explained, "it's compiled with similar optimizations as the kernel and has access to fast instrinsics (sse, avx)."
2. The Mixed Experience and Compatibility with Desktop Environments (KDE vs. Others)
There is a clear divergence in user experience regarding the stability and usability of the KDE Plasma desktop environment on CachyOS, with some users reporting failures and others experiencing smooth operation on the same setup.
- Supporting Quote (Failure): User "whalesalad" noted issues with standard Plasma installation: "KDE Plasma doesn't work, but Hyprland and Gnome do."
- Supporting Quote (Success): Conversely, "Ocerge" reported no issues with KDE Plasma, implying wider compatibility than suggested: "I use KDE Plasma and it worked just fine. In fact all of my games (including Arc Raiders) are working just fine on Proton 10..."
3. Framework's Sponsorship Strategy and Financial Health
The discussion frequently circles back to why Framework is sponsoring CachyOS and whether the company, being a hardware startup, can afford these open-source contributions, leading to comparisons with other sponsored projects like Omarchy.
- Supporting Quote: "nrp" (presumably from Framework) clarified the budget behind the sponsorships: "Our total set of 2025 sponsorships and donations is around $225k, which is a fraction of a percent of our 2025 revenue. We would like to and plan to increase the funding we allocate to open source projects that our products and customers depend on in 2026. Our financials are healthy, and we see this as a good investment."
- Supporting Quote: Concerns and comparisons arose regarding the impact of these sponsorships, especially contrasting CachyOS with the controversial Omarchy project: "jsheard" stated, "Even if Framework were to dismiss or overlook the controversy surrounding Omarchys creator... surely there are better ways to allocate OSS funding than sponsoring a multi-millionaire executives pet project."