1. Apple’s parallax “Street View” is a neat, under‑appreciated visual trick
Users praised the subtle 3‑D effect that Apple added to its web‑based Street View, noting how smooth it feels compared with Google’s implementation.
“It’s such a subtle effect that I still break my brain trying to determine whether or not I’ve made it up.” – Oarch
“The effect is unbelievably smooth compared to what Google maps have.” – efilife
2. Google’s Street View is seen as stagnant and poorly integrated
Many commenters lament that Google has not modernised its Street View for over a decade, missing opportunities for 3‑D navigation, VR, and AR. They argue that the feature is hard to access, under‑used, and could be a gateway to a new monopoly.
“Street View is such a missed opportunity… Google has consistently failed to recognize the value of the product.” – modeless
“People rarely use the Street View feature because it’s difficult to access… If it was seamlessly integrated into satellite view and directions then it would see much more usage.” – modeless
3. Coverage gaps, open alternatives, and privacy concerns dominate the conversation
Users point out that Apple’s Street View is limited to a few cities, while Google’s coverage is uneven worldwide. Open‑source options (Mapillary, Panoramax) are discussed, and privacy worries about seeing inside homes are raised.
“I just wish Apple would add more streets… there are literally a couple of cities between me and London.” – hnlmorg
“I can see inside peoples kitchens and living rooms on Street View… I had to ask Google twice to block my house.” – encom
“Mapillary has surprisingly good coverage in some places, but the experience is lacking… most of the images aren’t 360 views.” – ks2048