1. Is it really a Google product?
The community is split over whether the CLI is an official Google offering.
- “This is not an officially supported Google product.” – spankalee
- “I think an official project from Google would be hosted under github.com/google.” – hrmtst93837
- “It’s published by Google, they just don’t provide active ‘support’ for it.” – Lermatroid
2. Authentication is a nightmare.
Users repeatedly complain that the setup requires a full GCP project, OAuth screens, and manual scope verification.
- “I had to do all that the last time I wanted to do a little JS in my Google Sheets.” – jitl
- “The error tells me I need to verify my app… there’s no streamlined way to do this.” – virgildotcodes
- “I need to create an app in GCP to use it. Can't really expect non‑technical users to set this up across the company.” – mogili1
3. CLI vs. MCP vs. raw API – which is better for agents?
The discussion centers on the ergonomics of a CLI for LLMs versus a machine‑compatible protocol or plain HTTP calls.
- “CLI is probably more reliable.” – wonderfuly
- “The CLI has abstracted that into one single reusable, scriptable command.” – theshrike79
- “MCP is like ‘this is what the API is about, figure it out’.” – fergie
- “CLI tools are easy to write and you can cut it down to only what you need, saving thousands of tokens per prompt.” – corby
4. DevRel projects are often short‑lived and poorly maintained.
Many users warn that Google DevRel releases are “samples” that can be abandoned quickly.
- “They are not actually tasked with or graded on engineering projects.” – spankalee
- “I once had to fork a DevRel CLI that our on‑call scripts depended on and maintaining that fork cost a weekend plus a steady trickle of small fixes.” – hrmtst93837
- “It could be abandoned. That happens frequently with DevRel projects.” – spankalee
These four themes capture the main concerns and viewpoints circulating in the discussion.