Project ideas from Hacker News discussions.

GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark

📝 Discussion Summary (Click to expand)

1. Speed vs. cost – the “fast‑but‑expensive” debate
Users are excited about the new Codex‑Spark speed, but many point out that the price tag is a deal‑breaker.

“/fast is insanely expensive.” – bearjaws
“I’m burning through $22 in 15 minutes.” – bearjaws
“It costs $200 for a month.” – wahnfrieden

2. Quality matters more than raw speed
A recurring sentiment is that a faster model is useless if it can’t produce correct, agent‑friendly code.

“I don’t want a faster, smaller model. I want a faster, better model.” – behnamoh
“The Codex model has no idea about how to call agents.” – behnamoh
“Speed is especially important when productionizing AI.” – jusgu

3. Hardware & scalability concerns
The discussion pivots to whether Cerebras, GPUs, TPUs, or other custom silicon can actually deliver the promised throughput without prohibitive cost or yield issues.

“Cerebras is a dinner‑plate sized chip… $1m+/chip.” – latchkey
“TPUs don’t have enough memory either, but they have really great interconnects.” – latchkey
“Cerebras will be substantially better for agentic workflows in terms of speed.” – the_duke

These three themes—pricing, model quality, and underlying hardware—drive the bulk of the conversation.


🚀 Project Ideas

Multi‑Model Routing Service

Summary

  • Unified API that routes coding tasks to the fastest, most cost‑effective LLM (Codex, Claude, GLM, etc.) based on task size, latency, and accuracy needs.
  • Provides real‑time cost and latency dashboards, and automatic fallback to cheaper models when budgets are tight.
  • Core value: eliminates the “fast‑but‑expensive” vs “slow‑but‑cheap” dilemma and lets developers focus on code, not pricing.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Developers, dev‑ops, AI ops teams
Core Feature Dynamic routing engine + cost/latency monitoring
Tech Stack Node.js + FastAPI, Redis, OpenAI/Anthropic/GLM APIs, WebSocket, Grafana
Difficulty Medium
Monetization Revenue‑ready: subscription + pay‑per‑token

Notes

  • HN users complain: “/fast is insanely expensive” and “I want a faster, better model.”
  • The service directly addresses these pain points by balancing speed and cost.
  • Discussion potential: how to weight accuracy vs latency, pricing models for multi‑model usage, and open‑source vs commercial deployment.

Agentic Debugging Loop

Summary

  • CLI tool that runs coding agents in a closed‑loop: plan → execute → fast verification → slow verification → repeat until tests pass or timeout.
  • Automatically runs unit tests, static analysis, and diff checks; can be scheduled to run overnight.
  • Core value: frees developers from manual debugging loops and prevents agents from getting stuck in endless cycles.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Software engineers, AI developers
Core Feature Automated verification loop with unit tests & static analysis
Tech Stack Python, Docker, pytest, mypy, GitHub Actions, SQLite
Difficulty Medium
Monetization Hobby

Notes

  • Commenters say: “I routinely leave codex running for a few hours overnight to debug stuff” but worry about endless loops.
  • The tool gives confidence that the agent will stop when the code satisfies tests, addressing the “never pulling itself out” concern.
  • Practical utility: can be integrated into CI pipelines or used as a local debugging assistant.

Live Improv Presentation Generator

Summary

  • Web app that uses LLMs to generate slide decks in real time, with voice input and an “improv mode” that proposes multiple next slides on the fly.
  • Supports dynamic chart generation (Mermaid, D3) and QR‑code embedding for live references.
  • Core value: turns static slide decks into interactive, audience‑responsive presentations.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Presenters, educators, marketers
Core Feature Voice‑driven, LLM‑powered slide generation with improv mode
Tech Stack React, WebRTC, Whisper, OpenAI API, D3.js, QR‑code library
Difficulty High
Monetization Revenue‑ready: freemium + premium templates

Notes

  • HN users love the idea of “improv mode” and “live slides” (e.g., “I want to branch off based on audience questions”).
  • The product offers a tangible, creative use case for LLMs beyond code, sparking discussion on real‑time LLM integration and UI/UX challenges.

Read Later