1. “Copilot” has become a generic, over‑used brand name that masks what the actual product does > “Well, no, Office is now also called Copilot. They renamed it!” – sublinear
2. Confusion between “GitHub Copilot” and the VS Code integration leaves users unsure which service they’re paying for
“There is no VSCode Copilot. There is GitHub Copilot integration inside VS Code.” – chatmasta
3. Microsoft’s naming conventions are widely criticized for being confusing and unhelpful
“I really hate Microsoft's naming conventions. At least call that one Copilot for Devs or something more meaningful.” – giancarlostoro
4. The “Copilot” label is used as a marketing shortcut for AI across many unrelated services, creating brand fatigue
“Copilot is just Microsoft's term for AI. How many products have Copilot? Just about all of them.” – lateforwork
5. Users are skeptical about the real added value of Microsoft’s AI features compared with alternatives
“It's wildly confusing branding not only because they're identically‑named things that both repackage OpenAI's LLMs, but also because they're both ultimately owned by the same company.” – ethmarks
These five themes capture the dominant sentiments expressed in the discussion.