1. AI‑generated writing feels “sloppy” and untrustworthy
“It just sounds so stupid.” – causal
“This reads like it was written by an LLM.” – darkport
“I have grown to despise this AI‑generated writing style.” – drc500free
2. McKinsey’s tech culture is seen as weak and “software‑illiterate”
“McKinsey’s world‑class technology teams… are actually contractors.” – frereubu
“They’re basically a bunch of consultants who don’t know what they’re doing.” – cmiles8
“The tech initiative was a failure and Lilli’s problem is just a symptom of it.” – itsnotme12
3. AI agents expose serious security gaps (prompt injection, SQLi, writable prompts)
“Within 2 hours, the agent had full read and write access to the entire production database.” – cs702
“The system prompts could be changed through the same flaw.” – maciusr
“The agent had no credentials, no insider knowledge, just a domain name and a dream.” – gbourne1
4. Consulting firms are criticized for being a “political tool” rather than a technical partner
“They’re just a way to legitimize a decision that’s already been made.” – entropes
“You can hire them to get the credit or to pin the blame.” – steve1977
“They’re a ‘scapegoat’ for any failure.” – frankfrank13
These four threads dominate the discussion, framing the debate around AI‑authored content, McKinsey’s internal tech competence, the new security risks of autonomous agents, and the real value (or lack thereof) that consulting firms bring to technology projects.