1. Build Quality Tradeoffs for Modularity
Framework prioritizes repairability/upgradability, leading to compromises in premium feel, bulkiness, and polish at β¬2000 price.
"I appreciate the authors thoughtful review here, but I canβt help but be frustrated by the constant lack of understanding of the core value proposition of framework... People will lament how manufacturers donβt have upgradable ram, etc and then turn around and are upset at the bulkiness of a repairable laptop, or the price." - comte7092
"The sharp edges are exclusively an issue with the Framework 16 due to the spacers... I've been scratched by them and had my arm hair caught and pulled." - slabity
2. Superiority of MacBooks
MacBooks excel in build, battery, display, and reliability, often preferred over Framework despite lacking modularity.
"Modern Macbooks are just so much better in terms of feel it's like comparing tech from a different decade." - justin66
"Nothing beats a MacBook Air if youβre not chasing raw performance." - RomanPushkin
"speakers, display, and trackpad are subpar. I get that I'm spoiled by the quality of a MacBook Pro in those areas." - ziml77
3. Limited Practical Value of Upgradability
Upgrades/repairs are rare; most users prioritize daily usability over future-proofing, with high costs diminishing appeal.
"repair-ability only matters if you expect the laptop to break... upgrade-ability is of dubious value for most people." - Frotag
"The market assigns almost no value to these tenets, nor do the consumers participating in it." - DetectDefect
"You can get two base MacBook Airs for the price of that laptop." - IshKebab