Theme 1 – Privacy concerns & desire for an opt‑in setting
Many commenters objected to the feature sending any password‑related data to a third party by default, arguing it should require explicit user consent.
- “Tough one. I get the intention but this should've been opt‑in.” – TavsiE9s
- “Personally I use HIBP but I would still be annoyed to learn a system I installed mainly for privacy was sending private data to a third party by default.” – janice1999
- “The feature is not the problem. … It should be opt‑in.” – flapperdeflip
Theme 2 – Developer tone and dismissiveness
Critics felt the maintainer’s replies were abrasive, condescending, or poorly handled community feedback.
- “And that kids is a clear example of how not to interact with people online.” – l-albertovich
- “Yeah not a good look. This is probably the worst way to handle community feedback.” – zephyreon
- “My replies there were more dismissive than they should have been. My apologies.” – frenck
Theme 3 – Open‑source expectations: threats to fork, uninstall, or demand change
The discussion highlighted the tension between user ultimatums (forking or abandoning the project) and the maintainer’s stance that open source owes no obligations.
- “If this is all reason for you to uninstall and fork… So be it, it is open source after all.” – flanz_10
- “Working on a fork already: Lets spend some tokens! :)” – flapperdeflip
- “An ultimatum is a threat. That’s literally the definition.” – dpark (referring to statements like “we will uninstall and fork if you don’t fix this”).