Three dominant themes in the discussion
| # | Theme | Representative quotes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI’s role in tax processing and its limits | • SamoyedFurFluff: “The thing that makes me nervous is the statement that they plan to use AI. AI? The thing that is mathematically incapable of perfection, on finance information, for which perfection is table stakes?” • rtkwe: “Most tax returns these days are prepared and submitted electronically so the basic work of the arithmetic involved should be as close as possible to perfect already…LLMs have been pretty bad at that.” • kerblang: “I'm starting to realize that an LLM isn't gonna take my job, but it's beginning to make the job aggravating enough to quit anyhow.” |
| 2 | Political under‑funding and erosion of IRS effectiveness | • cael450: “The people in charge have a pathological hatred for the IRS…AI is just an excuse to continue destroying the capabilities of the IRS.” • mschuster91: “Starve the beast in action. The less employees the IRS has, the lower the chance there are enough staff on hand to audit the truly uber‑rich properly.” • munk‑a: “They have worked recently to implement a self‑hosted tax submission system and given their rate of return…netting $415 for every dollar of funding in 2024.” |
| 3 | Debate over tax‑code complexity and calls for simplification | • dheera: “They could also simplify tax law and they wouldn't need so much enforcement. There shouldn't be 5,000 types of taxes spread all over the place.” • AdamH12113: “I agree with your overall point of simplifying taxes by merging more things into income tax, but some of the taxes you mentioned are levied by local governments to fund themselves.” • claytongulick: “I like the idea of consumption tax exclusively… It’s easy to drive behavior and make it fairer.” |
These three threads—AI reliability, political manipulation of IRS resources, and the push to simplify an over‑complicated tax system—capture the bulk of the conversation.