Theme 1 – Historic portables as reference points
- “Well, there was the Commodore SX 64. Not exactly lap sized but portable for sure.” — weinzierl
- “It weighed 23 pounds. It was approximately as portable as a tower PC. You could schlep one around, but it'd get heavy after a while.” — kstrauser
- “Beat the heck out of dragging a 1702, a 1541 and a C64 around, though. I have three and they made regular trips to vintage fests because they were easy to set up.” — classichasclass
- “Not much later there was the Radio Shack Model 100, and a bit after that the Gateway portables, and of course, eventually the NEC Ultralite and eventually the Sharp PC‑6220 … Also, for those with deep pockets there were the GRiD laptops…. ” — WillAdams
Theme 2 – Suitability of a 6502‑based machine for modern work
- “A 6502 is capable of most actual workloads people have, whose profiles actually haven’t changed much. Almost all of our compute goes to GUI and rendering stacks that decorate our actual work.” — user3939382
- “I favor simpler machines, but that seems a bit of a stretch. Most people would like to communicate over the internet without every intermediate hop seeing their traffic … therefore they want TLS which I don't think is practical on a 6502? To say nothing of watching videos and listening to music.” — yjftsjthsd‑h
- “I'd compare to a z80 with 64k of memory, which would be enough to run CP/M. That wouldn't allow TLS, or music playback, but it would allow wordperfect, turbo pascal, a bunch of old C‑compilers, and a spreadsheet or two.” — stevekemp
- “Zoom calls? Maybe Bullshit Jobs was onto something, it seems that my entire work day consists of work decoration.” — Grombobulous
Theme 3 – Technical design and engineering trade‑offs of the LT6502b prototype
- “ 65C02 running at 10 MHz * 46 KByte of user RAM * EhBASIC 22p2 with custom extensions * eWOZMON * Compact Flash for storage * Built in battery (7400 mAh currently) * USB‑PD Rechargable * 10.1″ Screen with 1024x600 and 256 colours * WiFi Modem … * nanoSwinSID for sound” — flopsamjetsam (specs)
- “Surely a laptop prototype based on such a tested and well‑worn CPU with 48 K of RAM would be cool, but shouldn't it sip power? Like shouldn't it last for like months on a charge?” — system7rocks
- “The display also takes power, quite a lot actually – 2‑5 W.” — oofbaroomf
- “It's gotta be integrated together (and possibly be at a smaller process size) before you get all the power savings. If you have a real 6502, it has no internal RAM or cache, and you need to send power back and forth to the RAM chips … If you ran a 6502 emulator on a cheap ARM SOC, it would be much lower power.” — Dwedit
- “Unless you use bank switching, which historically a lot of 6502 machines did use (e.g. Apple III/IIe/IIc, BBC Master 128, Commodore 128, Commodore CBM‑II, etc)” — skissane*