Four dominant themes in the Hacker News discussion
- Codex/Claude bundling LibreOffice inflates download numbers
- “Yeah, an AI tool: The ChatGPT/Codex app bundles a full copy of LibreOffice” – andai
- “Could also be due to the fact that every codex install includes a copy of libreoffice” – jgbuddy
-
“People who have never known about Libre Office are now downloading and using Libre Office (often without realizing it).” – vayup
-
“Record‑breaking” weekly downloads are meaningless because numbers have been rising steadily
- “The number of weekly downloads has simply been increasing over time, due to growing popularity. Calling each new high 'record-breaking' is a bit meaningless.” – smokel
- “Calling each new high 'record-breaking' is a bit meaningless.” – tzs (repeated)
-
“If every 'weekly download count after a new release' … is consistently being broken on each new release due to generally increasing popularity, then it doesn’t make sense to imply causality …” – progval
-
Lack of built‑in AI is seen as a feature (anti‑AI sentiment) vs. desire for optional AI
- “Yes, no (built-in) AI is now a feature” – ChrisArchitect (link)
- “You’re wrong. … AI is deeply unpopular with the general public and products that don’t include it are rapidly gaining in popularity. People are tired of AI being shoved down their throats without consent.” – r053bud
-
“I'm not anti‑AI, but I don't want it to be shoved down my throat in any and every app I have.” – bayindirh
-
Disagreement over how downloads are counted and what the stats really show
- “Switching to the monthly view, the downloads are actually mostly flat going back to 2019.” – Aurornis
- “I'd hardly consider fluctuations between 2.2 million and 3.3 million downloads 'flat'.” – vanderZwan
- “Looking at the stats in day view … the downloads for their release week were actually around 1.259 million … The Document Foundation is based in Germany so I kind of expected they would use ISO weeks.” – tzs (detailed week‑numbering critique)