Three prevalent themes in the discussion
- How the transparency works (science & safety)
- The effect comes from matching the refractive index of water‑based tissue with a high concentration of tartrazine (the yellow dye used in Doritos), not from “crushed Doritos.”
- gus_massa: “They use tartrazine that is a common dye for food, not crushed Doritos. They need a lot of dye to change the internal refraction index and make the meat transparent.”
-
Safety notes: EFSA finds no toxicity up to 2 g/kg, but the required ~5 % solution is far above typical food levels.
-
Humorous, speculative reactions
- Commenters joke about Dorito‑powered invisibility, transparent body parts, and pop‑culture references.
- mbStavola: “This is why we must fund the sciences. How else would we get transparent Dorito tendies?”
- waltbosz: “I’m trying to imagine the origin story… somebody wanted to make Doritos‑flavored chicken and accidentally discovered that the marinade turned the chicken breast transparent.”
-
dghughes: “What does it do to people? Do I get a transparent anus if I eat a family size bag of Doritos?”
-
Broader implications (medical potential, food‑culture critique, regulation)
- Some see promise for imaging/live‑tissue diagnostics, while others lament the increasingly chemical nature of snack foods and discuss naturalism vs. processing.
- JSR_FDED: “But what it reveals about our relationship with food is a little unsettling. The intensely chemical nature of Doritos and the whole notion of turning flesh into something alien …”
- dotancohen: Suggests the technique could help diagnose medical conditions.
- layer8: Points out EU labeling requirements for tartrazine (“may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children”).