Prevalent themes in the discussion
-
Browser‑based experimentation with tiny LLMs
Users highlighted the novelty of running several small language models directly in the browser.“You can try 7 different tiny LLM's in your browser.” – logicallee
“What I missed from the title was this: Can I try 7 different tiny LLMs in my browser?” – bigfishrunning
Links to demos (e.g., bhouston’s ThreeJS demo and jellyfiz’s AI‑attacks site) were shared to illustrate this ease of access. -
Limitations of small/specialized language models (SLMs)
Commenters repeatedly noted that these models lack the knowledge and reasoning needed for tasks like arithmetic or general assistance.“No, that is not what SLMs are useful for. They have very little knowledge, and typically lack reasoning skills. Useful applications include sentiment analysis, text classification, entity extraction, etc.” – smokel
“Completely unusable for that, yeah, that's a 100M model, not an assistant.” – ironqcold
Demonstrations of errors: PetitGPT claimed “2+2 is 2” (inventor7777) and gave a convoluted proof for 2 + 2 (tolugenius). -
UI/UX criticism and suggestions for improvement
Several participants found the interface confusing, overly dense, and poorly organized.“Cool project, but I'd really suggest looking at the UI. The text is too small and it's way too dense with information in general… I have to scroll through over a page length of (mostly useless, AI‑generated) information before getting to the actual interface.” – demibabs
“As others have said, the UI is VERY confusing, way too much stuff going on.” – inventor7777
Footer quirks (self‑link, “serve over HTTP” hint) were also called out as perplexing.