1. Google’s de‑facto browser monopoly
“This will result in Mozilla and Apple having to licence Google's model, or ship a model that's quirks‑compatible with the Google model in order to be interoperable. It may also become difficult for Chrome to update its own model for the same reasons.” — shevy-java
“I am very annoyed that Google kind of de‑facto controls the www (through Chrome, let's be honest here).” — shevy-java
2. Forced AI integration threatens user agency and privacy
“The Chrome model requires either 16 GB of RAM or more and 4 CPU cores or more or Strictly more than 4 GB of VRAM, and 22 GB of free space (it uses around 4.4 GB but it doesn’t want to use the remaining free space).” — jaffathecake
“We really need to change this. I don’t have a good solution here, but it can not continue that way.” — shevy-java > “Can you please explain how the hell AI slop is going to ‘enhance user agency’ or ‘make the web better’?” — orphea
3. Need for standardized, open models to avoid lock‑in
“I wonder if it makes sense for browser vendors to agree upon and ship various ‘standard models’ that are released into the public domain or something, and the API lets you pick between them.” — varun_ch > “We really need to change this. I don’t have a good solution here, but it can not continue that way.” — shevy-java