Theme 1 – Recovery takes geological, not human, time
- zhivota: “I had always assumed this, and my idea of nature bouncing back was more on the millions of years time scale as evolution would result in the refilling of empty ecological niches.”
- s08148692: “Yeah the news for me here is that people thought nature could ‘bounce back’ on a human timescale. Any human lifespan is just the blink of an eye to nature.”
Theme 2 – The idea of a stable natural equilibrium is a myth
- Fricken: “Nature is not harmonious, it is in constant flux. Saying it can bounce back implies there some state of equilibrium for it to bounce back to.”
- 317070: “The concept of ‘natural equilibrium’ is a 1950s cybernetic machine fantasy projected onto the natural world rather than an accurate reflection of ecological reality.”
- tkdb: “Doesn’t the premise of bouncing back imply an ideal state to bounce back to? … Any ideal state brings with it subjective criteria.”
Theme 3 – Human values and responsibility guide attitudes toward interventions
- Avicebron: “Sure we should get rid of the diseases, but what about the niche mosquitos serve as food for birds, bats, etc?”
- goatlover: “If the species are dying because of us then it’s not just life, it’s our behavior driving their extinction.”
- themaninthedark: “I feel like we should do our best to not destroy the environment, for altruistic reasons but also for the very selfish reason that I have children …”.