Theme 1: Fork relationship and contribution practices
“Hey, I'm the main contributor to this repo. I do review the code - the reason why all of the commits are shown in a short time is just because of the way that I rebase on upstream Immich.” – Deeds67
“It's not really an alternative to Immich as the title says, it's a fork that's continuously rebased with each release.” – bastawhiz
“There's no mention there of ‘our vibe‑coded implementations of these features were declined by upstream because we vibecoded them’; instead, they frame it as ‘upstream doesn't want these features for their users’…” – ubertaco
“I see no contributors and hundreds of commits in a very short amount of time. That's a red flag for now.” – y-c-o-m-b
Theme 2: Features addressing Immich shortcomings
“My only issue with Immich is the partner sharing and face recognition overhead per account. It is a massive oversight. Looks like Noodle Gallery explicitly solves this (and more). I'm sold.” – y-c-o-m-b
“Thank you for that -- the workaround for multiple users sharing a set of photos plus their own stuff is the one thing that's kept my family away from adopting it.” – tclancy
“And quite a few of the features seem like common sense additions that should be pulled into Immich itself.” – Firerouge
“Immich is absolutely wonderful. It may have some shortcomings … like partner sharing and sharing facial recognition between users.” – jmathai
Theme 3: Concerns about AI/LLM‑generated code and trust
“I feel like the comparison page is full of them.” – ValentineC (referring to “Claudisms”)
“I read their ‘why use our fork’ page, and it's very obviously AI‑written, which causes me to distrust it.” – ubertaco
“Why is the link to a (seemingly) AI summary?” – scosman
“Please no AI slop.” – szmarczak
“Looking at the latest commits, Noodle Galery has many signed with Claude, but Immich doesn't. Is LLM policy a reason for fork?” – gnull