1. The review process feels opaque and single‑handed
Users complain that the directory’s curator decides what gets added without any clear criteria or feedback.
“I have no idea how they decide what makes it into the directory and what doesn’t so I’ve stopped trying.” – throwaway150
“Submissions go through an opaque review process and a lot of good submissions don’t make it.” – throwaway150
“The process is: I add blogs that are interesting, recently‑updated, etc, when I have time.” – philgyford
2. A desire for community‑driven, human‑curated directories
Many participants argue that a single maintainer can’t match the breadth and quality of a community effort, and that human curation is essential to keep AI‑generated “slop” out.
“Given how worried everyone is about the AI slopocalypse… maybe it’s time for a resurgence of human‑curated directories.” – simonw
“I was more interested in finding something less personal and more community‑ish.” – throwaway150
“I also maintain a human‑curated directory (and search engine) of personal blogs.” – freetonik
3. Scope, diversity, and usability of the directory
Participants discuss the need for broader coverage (non‑English, niche topics), better categorisation, and improved user experience (sorting, RSS feeds).
“There’s an RSS planet that curates blogs about emacs.” – 8organicbits
“I was looking at the RSS spec… taxonomy.” – 8organicbits
“I have a page on my site dedicated to list the blogs I frequent.” – rednafi
“We need more foreign‑language indie blogs.” – teotimepacreau
These three themes—openness of the review process, the push for community curation, and the call for richer, more diverse content—dominate the discussion.