Four key themes that dominate the discussion
| # | Theme | Representative quotes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Civ III is the “gold‑standard” for many fans | “3 is still my favourite of the series.” – data‑ottawa “I love civ 1 so so much.” – dr_dshiv “I prefer Civ 3 to 2 and 4.” – warmwaffles |
| 2 | Modding and community‑driven customization | “The modding community was gigantic for 3 and was simply amazing being a part of it.” – warmwaffles “OpenCiv3 was started by Civ 3 modders, and we all have our passionate reasons for preferring it.” – WildWeazel |
| 3 | Open‑source remakes as a way to revive classic Civs | “FreeCiv covers civ 1 and 2 more or less.” – toast0 “OpenCiv3 is built with Godot and C# and is open‑source.” – WildWeazel “UnCiv covers civ 5 as well.” – culi |
| 4 | Critiques of newer releases (Civ 4/5/7) and AI/diplomacy shortcomings | “Civ 4 was a travesty unless you’re REALLY into religion.” – apothegm “Civ 7 deviated too hard from the formula.” – bigstrat2003 “The AI is supposed to play to lose, but it’s still weak.” – chongli |
These four threads capture the bulk of the conversation: nostalgia for Civ III, the power of modding, the appeal of open‑source remakes, and the frustration with recent entries and their AI/diplomacy systems.