1. THC Presence ≠ Driving Impairment
Skepticism that high THC levels prove causation, due to persistence in habitual users and poor correlation with impairment like BAC for alcohol.
"THC in the blood doesn’t mean actively high for habitual users" (meroes).
"There’s no reliable way to determine impairment from a blood test" (Ancapistani).
2. Need for Baseline Population Data
Calls for THC prevalence in general drivers/population to contextualize 40% rate in fatalities.
"I am curious what percentge of the general populous test positive for THC. It would give better context" (neoCrimeLabs).
"If 40% of people test positive for THC, then this would mean there is no effect" (watwut).
3. Post-Legalization/COVID Reckless Driving & Enforcement Failures
Anecdotes of more public THC use, stoned driving, and broader lawlessness; demands for harsher penalties on repeat offenders.
"I see people smoking and vaping at stoplights all the time... far more of this... since legalization" (SilverElfin).
"The United States could dramatically improve its road safety if it kept maybe 1-3% of its drivers off the road permanently" (spamizbad).