1. Paint.NET is praised as a lightweight, intuitive editor that many users miss on Linux
- “Paint.net is just better in every way.” — 3836293648
- “I use Krita, but I miss Paint.NET … It’s lighter, simpler, and faster with a much more intuitive UX.” — louthy
- “Paint.net is my go-to image editing software … I don’t need the kitchen sink.” — colkassad
2. The AI‑assisted (Claude) rewrite of Direct2D sparked backlash and ethical debate
- “This was written by our good friend Claude, without whom this would NOT have been possible and would NEVER have happened.” — judah (via the forum post quoted in the thread)
- “Thanks to Claude Code, it's now a reality… It's buggy and slow, but real progress is being made.” — haunter
- “Use of Claude Code for an application used by artists. Just a fundamental misalignment of expectations.” — Philpax
- “It's Bluesky, they hate AI so the mob bullied him to delete the posts.” — haunter
3. Licensing status, open‑source alternatives, and cross‑platform viability are hot topics
- “Paint.net was originally MIT licensed but the author closed its source because people did not give him credit.” — RunSet
- “Paint.net used to be an open source collaboration project … Today it is a private closed source project accepting donations.” — nashashmi
- “Paint.net itself is still not open-source, so no distro will distribute it.” — gertop
- “Very different software. Paint.NET is mostly a composition/annotation tool … Krita revolves around digital painting.” — orbital-decay
- “I guess more digital art options on Linux are always good, but … is there even a good reason to use it when something like Krita exists?” — vunderba