The three most prevalent themes in the Hacker News discussion are:
1. Scrutiny Over the "100% Open Source" Claim
Many users debated the meaning and accuracy of the claim that Pebble software is now "100% Open Source," focusing on the presence of non-free binary blobs required for certain hardware features (like the heart rate sensor).
- Supporting Quote: One user, critical of the headline, stated: "Then say 'Pebble Watch Software written by Core Devices Is Now 100% Open Source', or 'Pebble mobile app open sourced' (that seems to be the major actual change?), or something like that. The thing they've actually done should be commended, but that doesn't mean ignoring that they've chosen to make a claim in the headline that isn't actually true." (yjftsjthsd-h)
- Supporting Quote: Countering this, another user argued that the non-free components are optional: "If they are not mandatory it's 100%. Otherwise according to your standard, Debian is not 100% free software either." (darkwater)
2. The Fallout and Resolution of the Rebble Conflict
There was significant discussion regarding the recent public dispute between Core Devices (Pebble revival team) and Rebble (the community maintaining the original watch ecosystem), with most users viewing the recent announcements (especially the open-sourcing of the app) as a positive resolution favoring community flexibility.
- Supporting Quote: One user offered praise for the compromise enabled by the new strategy: "Love to see this! I personally find this incredibly exciting. There is a major death of hardware out there that is user-respecting and hacker-friendly, and it warms my heart immensely to see such committments." (freedomben)
- Supporting Quote: Another user reflected on Rebble's reaction: "It seems like Rebble (the board) really overplayed their hand." (infotainment)
3. High Value Placed on Repairability and Longevity (Especially Battery Life)
Users expressed strong excitement about physical design choices that promote longevity, particularly making the battery user-replaceable by utilizing a screwed-on back cover, contrasting this with the sealed designs common in modern wearables.
- Supporting Quote: A user affirmed their purchasing decision based on this feature: "I'm excited that the back will screw off so we can replace the battery. I'm curious about waterproofing. Will that hold?" (apparent)
- Supporting Quote: Another user noted the appeal of tangible hardware features over software optimization: "I can never go back to a 2 day battery life for a watch, even if my 5 year old iPhone technically canβt make it through half a day of useβ¦." (krabizzwainch)