1. Technical feasibility is still a hard problem
Many commenters point out that browsers simply aren’t “real torrent clients” and that discovery, STUN, and DHT work‑arounds are fragile.
“If browsers had real torrent clients we would be having a very different conversation.” – dcreater
“The problem is that browsers cannot be real torrent clients and open connections without some initial routing for the discovery.” – embedding‑shape
“I tried this, the functional ‘Functionality test page’ is stuck on ‘Loading peer web site… connecting to peers’.” – logicallee
2. Moderation, copyright, and censorship concerns dominate the debate
Participants repeatedly warn that a P2P web host can’t enforce rules, making illegal or copyrighted material easy to spread.
“I think it is very difficult (and dangerous to the host) to serve user‑uploaded videos at scale, particularly from a moderation standpoint.” – NewsaHackO
“IPFS however has no means to track the author or the license of content.” – grumbel
“I can't imagine that Peerweb has much in the way of stopping certain types of material from being uploaded.” – SLWW
3. Usability and performance are major roadblocks to adoption
Even when the idea works in theory, demos are slow, buggy, or unusable, which keeps users from trying it.
“It takes > 5 seconds to load a page.” – dpweb
“The demos don’t work for me.” – davidcollantes
“I tried this, the functional ‘Functionality test page’ is stuck on ‘Loading peer web site… connecting to peers’.” – logicallee
These three themes—technical limitations, moderation/legal risks, and poor user experience—capture the core concerns voiced in the discussion.