Theme 1 – Ethical stance on sponsorship vs. invasive ads
NewPipe’s developers argue that sponsorship is a relatively ethical form of advertising and that blocking it would turn the app into a “gatekeeper for advertising,” compromising its privacy‑first mission.
“Ethical advertising, for example through sponsorship, should therefore not be touched by us.” — dev_hugepages
Theme 2 – Criticism that sponsorship can still be unethical and that users should avoid all ads
Several commenters contend that sponsorship segments are often misleading or privacy‑invasive, and that maintaining privacy means refusing to watch any advertiser‑funded content, even sponsored spots.
“There's an obvious catch‑22 here: either you are maintaining privacy, and the sponsor has no way to know whether their segment was viewed, so you are wasting your life watching an ad to make an inanimate object happy, or they are spying on you to learn whether you watch it.” — ndriscoll
Theme – Acceptance of forks/add‑ons as a pragmatic solution
Many users see value in keeping the main NewPipe build sponsor‑free while allowing forks or plugins (e.g., PipePipe, FreeTube, ReVanced) to add SponsorBlock, preserving the original’s stance while still offering the feature to those who want it.
“I actually think this is 100% the correct move practically… Keeping it out of this popular option while remaining open source allows the original to be clear from 'wrongdoing' here … Then, the fork just adds sponsorblock, and things are ok.” — duskdozer