1. Grammar & spelling as a status signal
Many commenters argue that “good” grammar is a privilege that only people in power can afford to flaunt.
“Using language ‘correctly’ is one of humanity’s oldest class dividers.” – graypegg
“Bad Grammar is a courtesy.” – wolframhempel
2. Informality/typos as proof of humanity (vs. AI)
A recurring point is that a few deliberate mistakes make a text feel human and trustworthy, even though AI can now generate perfect prose.
“Informal tone and mistakes actually signal that the message was written by a human.” – bonoboTP
“You can prompt an LLM to add typos, though.” – kgeist
3. Counter‑signalling through dress and communication style
The discussion extends beyond language to how people use clothing or casual language to signal power or lack of concern.
“Not having to care is often part of the countersignaling.” – bonoboTP
“If you see someone in a t‑shirt and jeans they’re probably a founder or executive.” – rsynnott
4. Power dynamics & privilege in corporate messaging
Executives are seen as able to send short, sloppy messages because they’re busy and have the authority to ignore formal norms.
“The higher you are in the chain of corporate command, the less time you have to dedicate to each task.” – illusive4080
“If you’re a boss, you can send ‘K let circle back’ and nobody will question it.” – twoodfin
These four threads—status‑signaling grammar, authenticity via typos, counter‑signalling through style, and the privilege of power—capture the main currents of the conversation.