Theme 1 – Approximation vs. Real Color Math
Commenters noted that the article uses simplified, “bell‑curve‑like” cone sensitivities rather than more accurate models (e.g., Stockman‑Sharpe).
“the typical LMS responses for human cones … could easily be plotted instead of the bell‑curve‑like things they use here - why? Is it good enough for illustration? … D65 is very blue here.” – herf
“The sensitivity curves shown here are normalized approximations … In reality, the sensitivity curves are less smooth …” – ekunazanu (author)
Theme 2 – Starting from SPD and Physics First
Several participants praised the decision to begin with spectral power distributions and integrals, arguing it builds a correct physical foundation before tackling perception.
“I was thinking … this article approaches color better than the majority … Many of them start from RGB and work backwards … at least this start with SPD right out of the gate. The cone response overlap is implied via plots right at the beginning, and the first equation is an integral, and the correct integral …” – dahart
“I agree that working from RGB backwards results in a lot of back‑and‑forth … Starting with the SPD … is ultimately more intuitive …” – ekunazanu (author)
Theme 3 – Quality of Visualizations / Artistic Effort
The diagrams and overall visual presentation were highlighted as a standout, almost artistic, aspect of the piece.
“There is a Knuth/TeX like elegance in the diagrams that you don't see on the web … the visualizations … it is a fabulous piece of art.” – pmkary
“It did take a while to make, and thanks for the kind words!” – ekunazanu (author)