Theme 1: Doubt about the future relevance of niche/esoteric languages
- “I'm curious: does anyone really care about Racket anymore? In general, does anyone really care about esoteric languages anymore?” – so-cal-schemer
- “With AI, we have converged on a set of languages. For the web, it's JavaScript or TypeScript. For backend, it's Go and Rust. Pretty much nothing else can get picked by AI if you start a new project.” – so-cal-schemer
Theme 2: Defense of Lisp/Racket’s enduring productivity and AI compatibility
- “I think the Lisp family of languages are still the productivity boost they always were, especially with a good REPL. They can be as fast and safe as Rust and more expressive than JavaScript doing front‑end work.” – Anonymous defender
- “Frontier models are reported to work as effectively with Lisp as any other language, and you can have much more succinct (token efficient) code while having more meaningful abstractions for readability by humans.” – Anonymous defender
- “Most of my backends are written in Scala of all things, and LLMs have no issue with it. If anything, the expressive type system is helpful for them.” – BoxOfRain
Theme 3: Language design as a personal/hobby pursuit, acknowledging limited mainstream adoption
- “I'm saying this as someone who is designing a programming language, and for me, it's just a lot of fun, but I also know I should not hope for my language to take off anytime soon.” – so-cal-schemer
- “I've been messing around with a language that I summarize as: ALOE = Scheme + Smalltalk + Types” – dharmatech
- “quite elegant, feels like a great balance idiomatic scheme and OO” – agumonkey