1. Distrust of government handling of personal data
- “The skeptic in me really can't trust our current government to protect my information.” – sgnelson
- “You could never trust the US government to protect our information since it moved online.” – Cider9986
- “So that’s why big ballz (co author of the OP) put our PII in an insecure AWS instance via DOGE’s starlink terminal.” – iAMkenough
2. Concerns about the effectiveness and technical limits of PII redaction solutions
- “98.4% is nowhere near good enough to call it PII redaction.” – nhinck2
- “The only thing that makes these people happy is zero data retention and deterministic redaction at the source. Regex over arbitrary string literals does not represent determinism in this context.” – bob1029
- “Is this good enough for HIPAA?” – Onavo
- “The lowest hanging fruit … is to clearly tell people … not to share any personal info with chatbots … the government should have extended HIPPA … to AI companies.” – dwa3592
3. Emphasis on transparency, open‑source availability, and the ability to run/inspect the model locally
- “Source available here … you can also switch that out for your own with the source.” – BowBun
- “I mean, it can be run locally, so you don't necessarily have to trust it, unless there's been any model‑as‑a‑vector CVE.” – goodmythical
- “The source code should be public domain, no?” – Cider9986