IdeaWell

Project ideas from Hacker News discussions.

Ruby website redesigned

Original Article

Hacker News Discussion

📝 Discussion Summary (Click to expand)

4 Most Prevalent Themes of the Opinions

1. Poor Technical Implementation & Performance Users criticize the site's reliance on JavaScript for basic static content, leading to slow load times and degraded performance. * "It takes a few seconds to appear. All to show a scaling animation that can be achieved with a couple of lines of CSS." (troupo) * "So many Web designers put zero thought into how their page looks when it is not loaded... On this page, it opens up with a '100%' loading indicator, for a site that appears to have no interactivity that would require JS." (Kwpolska) * "Pages like these used to be caricatures of the modern web, but are now acceptable." (mkl95)

2. Reliance on JavaScript for Static Content A major complaint is that core site features (like code examples and the download button) break when JavaScript is disabled, violating principles of progressive enhancement. * "With JS disabled, you get nothing. A language website should be the poster child for progressive enhancement." (yoan9224) * "The download button, which is just a link, requires JavaScript to render." (InsideOutSanta) * "I wonder if Ruby still sticks to Free Software principles." (mindaslab)

3. Design Choices & User Experience Opinions are split on the visual design itself, with some praising the modern aesthetic while others find it gaudy or criticize specific UX choices like the "0%" loading spinner. * "Refreshing and delightful! ... this design really makes me want to try Ruby again :)" (novoreorx) * "Unappealing, really gaudy, if that's the right word." (auxide) * "Loading percentage in the middle? I haven’t seen one of those since Micromedia flash days." (mabedan)

4. Content & Messaging Critiques Users debate the site's messaging, particularly the "Programmer's best friend" tagline and the inclusion of DHH in testimonials, with some finding them off-putting or ineffective for newcomers. * "'Programmer's best friend' is precisely the wrong thing to do though... it says nothing and only makes the reader confused." (ModernMech) * "Bad branding community wise to quote DHH on the frontpage. Will immediately turn away many." (rhgraysonii) * "The old one was better because it said something about what the language is and how it benefits the user." (ModernMech)

🚀 Project Ideas

Static Site Scaffold Generator

Summary

  • A command-line tool that scaffolds a high-performance, progressive-enhanced documentation website for programming languages or API libraries.
  • It generates pure HTML and CSS for the initial content load, with optional JavaScript for only the most necessary interactive elements, ensuring the site works perfectly even with JS disabled.
  • Core value proposition: Eliminate the performance and accessibility trade-offs of modern JS-heavy frameworks for static content sites, delivering the "HN-style" speed and reliability out of the box.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Open-source maintainers, technical writers, and developers creating language or API documentation sites.
Core Feature Generates a static site with zero required JavaScript, optimized assets, and optional hydration for interactive components (like code runners or theme toggles) only where strictly necessary.
Tech Stack Node.js (for build tool), TypeScript, Modern HTML/CSS (no framework required).
Difficulty Medium
Monetization Revenue-ready: SaaS for managed hosting + premium templates, or a one-time purchase license for the generator.

Notes

  • Addresses the frustration expressed by chrisandchris ("navigate to sites/positions in-site - that is just dumb") and troupo ("All to show a scaling animation that can be achieved with a couple of lines of CSS") regarding unnecessary JavaScript usage for simple interactions.
  • High practical utility for the exact type of audience present on Hacker News who are complaining about the Ruby site's performance.
  • Solves the "0% loading spinner" issue pointed out by elcapitan and Kwpolska.

Visual Regression & Bloat Monitor

Summary

  • A developer tool that integrates into CI/CD to automatically detect and report on front-end performance regressions and layout shifts for websites.
  • It specifically highlights areas where animations or interactivity require heavy JS libraries when simple CSS would suffice, flagging the "bloat" criticized in the discussion.
  • Core value proposition: Prevent the deployment of "swollen" code (as described by timeon) by quantifying the performance cost of design decisions before they reach production.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Front-end developers, engineering managers, and performance-conscious open-source projects.
Core Feature Automated Lighthouse/Performance scoring on pull requests with a focus on "No-JS fallbacks" and visual comparison diffs to catch layout shifts caused by late-loading assets.
Tech Stack Playwright, Puppeteer, GitHub Actions/GitLab CI, Node.js.
Difficulty Medium
Monetization Revenue-ready: Freemium model (public repos free, private repos paid) or enterprise self-hosted license.

Notes

  • Directly addresses the troupo complaint about "loading progress even on a gigabit connection" and DetroitThrow noting the site's poor Lighthouse score.
  • Practical utility for any team maintaining a public-facing website where performance is a metric for user retention.
  • HN users love tools that enforce performance discipline and quantify "fluff," aligning with comments by pjmlp and braiamp.

HN-Style Comment Simulator

Summary

  • A web service that provides an "Honest Feedback" widget for design launches, simulating the likely Hacker News critique of a website before it goes live.
  • Users input their website URL or design screenshots, and the tool uses a fine-tuned LLM trained on technical discussions (like the provided one) to generate a critique focusing on JS dependency, load times, and semantic HTML usage.
  • Core value proposition: Save developers the pain of public humiliation by proactively identifying the technical flaws that typically trigger the "HN mob" (e.g., lack of progressive enhancement).
Key Value
Target Audience UI/UX designers, product managers, and developers launching new software or websites.
Core Feature Automated audit reporting that mimics specific user archetypes (e.g., "The No-JS Purist," "The Performance Zealot," "The DHH Critic") based on the provided discussion context.
Tech Stack LLM API (e.g., GPT-4o), Browser automation, Web scraping.
Difficulty Low
Monetization Hobby: Free tier with limited audits; or Revenue-ready: Pay-per-audit model.

Notes

  • Meta-analysis of the discussion shows a clear pattern of complaints (loading spinners, Tailwind bloat, DHH quotes). This tool productizes that feedback loop.
  • Would appeal to ModernMech (who critiques the tagline) and hessart (who questions the development process).
  • Solves the unmet need for "thick skin" preparation in technical product launches.

Progressive Enhancement Code Linter

Summary

  • A static analysis tool (CLI/IDE plugin) that lints HTML/CSS/JS files to enforce progressive enhancement principles.
  • It flags instances where JS is used for navigation, simple animations, or content rendering that could be handled by native browser capabilities.
  • Core value proposition: Enforce the philosophy that "JavaScript is for interactions, not content," preventing the "frozen 0%" screen mentioned by Alifatisk.

Details

Key Value
Target Audience Front-end developers and strict engineering teams adhering to web standards.
Core Feature Rulesets to detect JS-reliant links, lack of noscript fallbacks for critical content, and heavy framework usage for static sites.
Tech Stack Node.js, ESLint (or Stylelint), AST parsing.
Difficulty High
Monetization Hobby: Open source (GitHub sponsorship).

Notes

  • Addresses the core technical grievance of markdown ("The decorative underlines... are embedded as content ( tags)! Amateur hour.") and Alifatisk (fetching static text via JS).
  • HN users like zelphirkalt explicitly mentioned that "it is usually very easy to make it work properly" if developers put thought into it; this tool enforces that thought process.
  • High potential for discussion as a standard-setter in the web development community.

Read Later