1. Compatibility layers are still immature and lack full GUI support
“In theory, running Apple Silicon apps on ARM64 linux machines would be really nice. But we are still far from having a performant and feature‑complete implementation of doing so.” – porphyra
“It is still far away from running your favorite mac GUI apps like Logic Pro or Xcode, but it is a work in progress…” – rvz
2. Why Wine works for Windows but no equivalent exists for macOS
“Win32 has a little less churn than AppKit used to. If you support the API surface of winxp from 25 years ago you can run a lot of stuff…. Apple, by contrast, historically has app compatibility as a non‑goal.” – asveikau
“The issue with running macOS apps via other operating systems is not the OS, but instead are the GUI frameworks expected (Carbon, Quartz, etc.). These frameworks are intentionally written for Apple hardware/macOS distros.” – AdieuToLogic
3. Limited practical demand; many users see little need for macOS‑only apps on Linux
“Cool that it exists, but I honestly don't even know which mac exclusive program I would want to install.” – nonestdeus
“A few years back, I would have dreamt to run Photoshop on Linux. But this and the mandatory utilities that come with it became so bloated that even if it was officially offered on Linux I am not sure I would be using it.” – LollipopYakuza