Theme 1 – Enterprise customers insist on SAML support; lacking it makes a product non‑viable
- “Eh, if you don’t have SAML support, I can find a product that does. Not a problem.” – ocdtrekkie
- “You either work with what we use or you are not viable as a product for our need.” – ocdtrekkie
Theme 2 – SAML is seen as outdated, insecure, or merely security theatre; OIDC is preferred
- “That mindset is indicative of security theatre to me.” – jeltz
- “Saml is just not reasonable in our modern security environment.” – tomjen3
- “You think companies that care about security should not care about integrating with flawed protocols?” – eximius
Theme 3 – Vendors weigh the market size vs. development cost when deciding to implement SAML
- “Honestly, it's an addressable market versus development cost question… How many clients will you lose if you support OIDC but not SAML?” – clhodapp
- “Finding out a company wants several grand to flip the ‘allow SAML’ switch on the tenant config, and a few thousand a year in additional licensing to leave it on.” – ocdtrekkie